| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
61. First day - a little ice mining report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ice mining is still very doable with multiboxing. I spend 10% more time setting up targets, but mine ice at twice the speed. I can't speak for all multiboxers, but I am loving this expansion :-) Also I'm going to test the whole respawning after ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.06 18:57:00
|
62. First day - a little ice mining report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mara Rinn wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Do ice fields respawn at DT? I was under the impression they did not, but I haven't had a chance to test. Yes, two brand new ice fields that were not there just before DT. I'm still harvesting them beca...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.06 14:22:00
|
63. First day - a little ice mining report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mara Rinn wrote: Johnnie Blue wrote: Pak Narhoo wrote: Eh, silly question but could you share that knowledge perhaps? Been running around in Amarr space and I haven't got a clue where the ice belts are now. The complete list of high...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.06 14:05:00
|
64. CCP amuses me when you all thought ice and r64 were the biggest score this patc... - in Market Discussions [original thread]
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=238311&find=unread
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.05 23:11:00
|
65. First day - a little ice mining report - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote: I can see IsBoxers (legit players until CCP decides they are not) being heavily hampered: not by the laser cycling but the roids forcing them to split their ships over multiple roids (that will deplete very fast anyway) ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.05 03:55:00
|
66. Ice Harvesting and Odyssey. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Khira Kitamatsu wrote: The place that will be highly contested is the couple of ice fields that are found in 0.0 space. Those will be worth a small fortune to whomever has control over them. What are you referring to exactly?
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.04 03:31:00
|
67. Ice- ageddon !?! - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Bugsy VanHalen wrote: I have missed an option here please enlighten me. Providence.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.06.01 11:49:00
|
68. Holy Bot Batman! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Multiboxing is valid gameplay.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.31 20:54:00
|
69. Sticky:Dev Blog: U and I made some changes - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
De Stil wrote: Love the changes, hate the post, seriously, no sub heads at all. As someone who has done a good bit of print layout design, the fact that there are any emoticons in any piece of professional writing at all makes me die a little i...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.30 18:10:00
|
70. Multiboxing - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Rengerel en Distel wrote: 2-3k to better enable yourself to not socialize with other people in a MMO? There are probably better uses for the money, many of which conclude with happy endings. Are people who play Age of Empires online coopera...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.30 14:48:00
|
71. Ice "the Oil of Eve" War Creator - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
What is all this talk about static ice belts and needing to "scan down" ice fields. Did I miss something? As far as I know there are no static ice belts and ice anomalies are auto scanned by the new scanner to 100%.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.30 12:47:00
|
72. New Expansion thoughts opinions love or hate? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
They are fixing the factory role cancel issue. Best expansion ever in my opinion.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.28 19:36:00
|
73. [Odyssey] Change to permissions for cancelling corporation jobs - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Oh.......my............gawd.............I am speachless. I think I am tearing up. I have waited for this day for so long. Thank you from the bottom of my cold corporate heart. I have some planning to do.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.28 16:01:00
|
74. License Agreement Update The end of multiboxing? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Multiboxing is valid gameplay.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.28 13:36:00
|
75. IS boxer Software and it's legality under the EULA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I can't believe I let myself get dragged into this conversation. I'm going back to my mining operation. Fly safe and don't forget to have fun :-)
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.22 16:37:00
|
76. IS boxer Software and it's legality under the EULA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
KasparHauser wrote: Jason Xado wrote: Multiboxing is valid gameplay. Absolutely, but it can be done without 3rd party software. But why would you want to do that? If multiboxing is valid gameplay, then why limit yourself with how you ...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.22 10:58:00
|
77. IS boxer Software and it's legality under the EULA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Ellen Thrace wrote: Korvus Falek wrote: I use ISBoxer and I do not use automation. I use replication. Have a good day. Both definitions are not mutually exclusive, therefore, even if it is a replication, it still is an Automation. J...
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.21 22:46:00
|
78. IS boxer Software and it's legality under the EULA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I can put a lot more nails into a piece of wood with a hammer than with my thumb. I don't call a hammer automation.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.21 22:01:00
|
79. IS boxer Software and it's legality under the EULA - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Multiboxing is valid gameplay.
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.20 14:48:00
|
80. 30 days dual character training - now on Singularity - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
I am really looking forward to this feature. Thank you CCP :-)
- by Jason Xado - at 2013.05.12 15:37:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |